Am 21.08.2013 19:01, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:43:16PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side.
>
> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
> ... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's existence
> in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
So it's isa-pvpanic meaning "I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic"
If we feel there's need to give libvirt a way to do
introspection into QEMU bugs, let's architect one.
Randomly renaming devices in the vain hope it's
the last major bug is not it.
NACK
Seconded. While we shouldn't rule out renaming devices, doing so as a
criteria for libvirt sounds utterly wrong.
Paolo, you are right that a single "NACK" cannot be a criteria, but a
single convincing justification by a random reviewer should be
sufficient to reconsider. :)
Adding some device property or obtaining the info via some existing
query-* QMP command might be better alternatives.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg