20 Feb
2012
20 Feb
'12
8:59 p.m.
On 02/20/2012 01:55 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/20/2012 10:10 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
+ +/* Flags for the 'type' field in next struct */ Should we specifically call out virDomainDeviceDef, rather than the vague "next struct"? But this is faithful code motion, for now.
Even though this patch was (mostly - see my addition of DEVICE_TYPE_NONE) code change, and I hadn't noticed that comment's exact text before, I agree with you, so I'm changing it to specifically say virDomainDeviceDef instead of "next struct".