On 11/12/2010 11:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:21:16AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 09:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> The XML docs describe a 'port' attribute for the
>> storage source <host> element, but the parser never
>> handled it.
>>
>> * docs/schemas/storagepool.rng: Define port attribute
>> * src/conf/storage_conf.c: Add missing parsing/formatting
>> of host port number
>> * src/conf/storage_conf.h: Remove bogus/unused 'protocol' field
>> ---
>> docs/schemas/storagepool.rng | 5 +++++
>
> Missing corresponding docs/formatstorage.html.in change.
As per the commit message, this is already documented, but not
implemented !
Good to know.
>> diff --git a/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng b/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng
>> index 54eb802..8f067f3 100644
>> --- a/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng
>> +++ b/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng
>> @@ -186,6 +186,11 @@
>> <attribute name='name'>
>> <text/>
>> </attribute>
>> + <optional>
>> + <attribute name='port'>
>> + <text/>
>
> Is text really appropriate?
I guess it should reference a port number
I don't see this patch applied yet. ACK with that nit to the schema fixed.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org