On 10/30/25 07:51, Peter Krempa via Devel wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 10:47:11 -0400, Aaron Brown wrote:
On 10/24/25 13:49, Peter Krempa wrote:
The patches look good to me as they addressed all my comments from previous version (and sorry for missing this, and the ping).
Any reason why this is still labelled as RFC? Can it be merged?
On 10/24/25 8:29 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
Hi Peter, I would appreciate you merging it. The RFC seems to be an oversight.
Hi all, I labelled these patches as RFC in case there were any additional changes requested. If not, it is ready to merge.
Please note for future patches, the RFC label is used for patches where you are unsure about your design (and e.g. didn't fully implement everything) or have a dependancy that's still blocking them.
In general anything that is not really supposed to be merged in the proposed form.
This series might have fallen through the cracks. It can be merged unless Aaron is supposed to resend it without RFC. Please let Aaron know what to do. Thanks. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards Boris Fiuczynski IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt Geschäftsführung: David Faller Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294