Re: [libvirt] [RFC v2] libvirt vGPU QEMU integration
From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:37 PM
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 03:56:21 +0000
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian(a)intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Kirti Wankhede [mailto:kwankhede@nvidia.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:22 PM
> > >>
> > >> 'max_instance':
> > >> Read-Only file. Mandatory.
> > >> Returns integer. Returns maximum mdev device could be created
> > >> at the moment when this file is read. This count would be updated by
> > >> vendor driver. Before creating mdev device of this type, check if
> > >> max_instance is > 0.
> > >
> > > Didn't we discuss this being being something like
"available_instances"
> > > with a "devices" sub-directory linking current devices of that
type?
> > >
> >
> > I'm ok with 'available_instances' as name of this file.
> > Yes, mdev device directory will have links to devices of that type. I
> > think that is part of mdev core module discussion. I'm trying to list
> > sysfs files for libvirt interface here to focus more on libvirt
> > interface. Hence didn't add that. I'll make sure to add all such
details
> > in future.
> >
> >
>
> Definitely you need provide those details since they also contain
> libvirt interface, e.g. 'destroy' which we discussed should be in
> mdev directory.
$ find /sys/devices -name remove | wc -l
24
$ find /sys/devices -name destroy | wc -l
0
'remove' is the sysfs deconstructor we should use.
make sense.
> Another example is class-specific attributes such
> as 'resolution', etc. which you listed under 'display class'. All
those
> attributes should be moved to mdev directory. Only class ID is
> required under each type.
Can you elaborate on what you're proposing here? If we don't have
attributes like 'resolution' under the type-id then we can't describe
to the user the features of the mdev before we create it. I don't
think anybody wants a 'create it and find out' type of interface.
Thanks,
I think such way would be racy. What about two clients creating mdev
devices simultaneously? How to guarantee their configuration of class
specific attributes not mutual-impacted since before creation any such
configuration would be global under that type?
My feeling is that we'd better keep create simple - just write a UUID
to "type-id/create". Any class-specific attribute, if we really want to
support, should be able to be individually configured with required
resource allocated incrementally on top of basic resources allocated
at create stage. Then libvirt can set those attributes between create
and open a mdev device. If this direction is accepted, then naturally
such attributes should be put under mdev directory. Possibly we
don't need a class description under type-id. libvirt just checks directly
whether any known class represented in each mdev directory (vendor
driver will expose it on demand), and then operate attributes under
that class.
Thanks
Kevin