ping^2?
No other opinions?
Tks,
John
On 06/20/2018 07:14 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 06/12/2018 10:32 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> v1:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-June/msg00465.html
>
> The first patch is essentially a repeat of the v1 patch, but with
> a more correct commit message. During testing if the same address
> was supplied for the --config it wasn't checked.
>
> The second patch rearranges qemuDomainAttachDeviceLiveAndConfig to
> perform CONFIG and LIVE actions separately since the generated
> @devConf or @devLive could be different depending on whether the
> incoming XML has an <address> or not and whether the corresponding
> domain parse and post parse algorithms need to generate some sort
> of address for the device.
>
>
> John Ferlan (2):
> qemu: Check for existing hostdev address for cold attach device
> qemu: Use the correct vm def on cold attach
>
> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
ping?
Can we come to a consensus either way on this? There's 2 that feel
fixing the underlying problem is worth it (myself and Laine) and 1 that
would not bother fixing the bug (Jano).
Tks -
John
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list