On 07/24/2017 09:38 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
All libvirt-dbus function should use virtDBus preffix and use only
one
coding style, camelCase.
s/preffix/prefix
In general... Should "bus_path" just be Path - seems redundant to have
"virtDBusBus"... It's not wrong, but mainly curious especially since the
"bus_" prefix got changed to virtDBus.
FWIW: Might also have been easier to convert all those
domain_from_bus_path calls into a helper first...
Since manager.c gets "virtDBusManager", domain.c gets
"virtDBusDomain",
and events.c gets "virtDBusEvents" should these be virtDBusUtil to
distinguish them from main.c which also uses "virtDBus"?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina(a)redhat.com>
---
src/domain.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
src/events.c | 20 +++++------
src/main.c | 2 +-
src/manager.c | 32 ++++++++---------
src/util.c | 17 ++++-----
src/util.h | 26 +++++++-------
6 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/domain.c b/src/domain.c
index 1bda3b8..4bfb314 100644
--- a/src/domain.c
+++ b/src/domain.c
[...]
@@ -236,13 +236,13 @@ domain_get_xml_desc(sd_bus_message *message,
sd_bus_error *error)
{
VirtManager *manager = userdata;
- _cleanup_(virDomainFreep) virDomainPtr domain = NULL;
- _cleanup_(freep) char *description = NULL;
+ _cleanup_(virtDBusVirDomainFreep) virDomainPtr domain = NULL;
+ _cleanup_(virtDBusFreep) char *description = NULL;
uint32_t flags;
int r;
- domain = domain_from_bus_path(manager->connection,
- sd_bus_message_get_path(message));
+ domain = virtDBusVirDomainFromBusPath(manager->connection,
+ sd_bus_message_get_path(message));
adjust alignment of 2nd argument (occurs a few more times too -
domain_get_stats, domain_shutdown, domain_destroy, domain_reboot,
domain_reset, domain_create, and domain_undefine)
if (domain == NULL) {
return sd_bus_reply_method_errorf(message,
SD_BUS_ERROR_UNKNOWN_OBJECT,
[...]