On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:25:26 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:12:19 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:56:17 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > Our current detection code uses just the number of CPU features which
> > need to be added/removed from the CPU model to fully describe the CPUID
> > data. The smallest number wins. But this may sometimes generate wrong
> > results as one can see from the fixed test cases. This patch modifies
> > the algorithm to prefer the CPU model with matching signature even if
> > this model results in a longer list of additional features.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
> > ---
> > src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 16 +++
> > src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 148
+++++++++++++++++++--
> > .../cputestdata/x86-cpuid-Core-i7-5600U-guest.xml | 11 +-
> > tests/cputestdata/x86-cpuid-Core2-E6850-guest.xml | 5 +-
> > tests/cputestdata/x86-cpuid-Core2-E6850-host.xml | 5 +-
> > tests/cputestdata/x86-cpuid-Xeon-5110-guest.xml | 5 +-
> > tests/cputestdata/x86-cpuid-Xeon-5110-host.xml | 5 +-
> > tests/cputestdata/x86-host+penryn-force-result.xml | 4 +-
> > 8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> ACK
Thanks, I pushed all but 8/10 and 10/10 which need to wait until
Eduardo's queue is pulled into QEMU master.
Since Skylake-Client was pushed to QEMU master yesterday I pushed the
remaining two patches in this series.
Jirka