On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 12:10 +0200, Fabiano FidĂȘncio wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:11 AM Pavel Hrdina
<phrdina(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Instead of removing the syntax-check job we can keep it if we use
> 'suite' labels for our tests in a way that we would use 'syntax'
label
> for syntax-check tests and 'unit' label for unit tests.
>
> That way the syntax-check job will call
>
> `meson test --suite syntax`
>
> and check job will call
>
> `meson test --suite unit`
Personally, I don't see a valid point on keeping the job.
Same here. Dan was arguing for keeping it, however. I wonder if he
changed his mind in the meantime...
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization