On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 07:23:15PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 17:44 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
One of the conventions we have had since the early days of libvirt is that every struct typedef, has a corresponding "Ptr" typedef too.
For example
typedef struct _virDomainDef virDomainDef; typedef virDomainDef *virDomainDefPtr;
Periodically someone has questioned what the purpose of these Ptr typedefs is, and we've not had an compelling answer, other than that's what we've always done.
[...]
Does anyone have suggestions for how these "Ptr" typedefs are benefiting libvirt ? Would anyone miss them ?
I consider them pointless obfuscation and would love to see them go.
Note that I'm not talking just about humans either: some tooling also struggles a bit with the additional layer of indirection.
That's good to know. If developer tooling usage is being harmed that significantly strengthens the case for removing them. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|