On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Having two "whiles" like that looks kinda off... I'd
rather
have something like
while (!virTimeBackOffHasExpired(&timeout))
or preferably something better than what I can come up with :)
The trouble is the function doesn't exactly do that. It also
performs the delay.
...Wait (suggested elsewhere) was a better idea.
> +/**
> + * virTimeBackOffWhile
> + * @var: Timeout variable (with type virTimeBackOffVar *).
> + *
> + * You must initialize @var first by calling the following function,
> + * which also starts the timer:
> + *
> + * if (virTimeBackOffStart(&var, first, timeout) < 0) {
> + * // handle errors
> + * }
> + *
> + * Then you use a while loop:
> + *
> + * while (virTimeBackOffWhile(&var)) {
> + * //...
> + * }
> + *
> + * The while loop that runs the body of the code repeatedly, with an
> + * exponential backoff. It first waits for first milliseconds, then
> + * runs the body, then waits for 2*first ms, then runs the body again.
> + * Then 4*first ms, and so on.
> + *
> + * When timeout milliseconds is reached, the while loop ends.
> + *
> + * The body should use "break" or "goto" when whatever
condition it is
> + * testing for succeeds (or there is an unrecoverable error).
> + */
> +bool virTimeBackOffWhile(virTimeBackOffVar *var);
> +
> #endif
API documentation should live in the .c file, like you did
with virTimeBackOffStart(). I guess it's just a consequence
of the "a" implementation using a macro for this part :)
OK.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/