ping^2?
No other opinions?
Tks,
John
On 06/20/2018 07:14 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 06/12/2018 10:32 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>> v1:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-June/msg00465.html
>>
>> The first patch is essentially a repeat of the v1 patch, but with
>> a more correct commit message. During testing if the same address
>> was supplied for the --config it wasn't checked.
>>
>> The second patch rearranges qemuDomainAttachDeviceLiveAndConfig to
>> perform CONFIG and LIVE actions separately since the generated
>> @devConf or @devLive could be different depending on whether the
>> incoming XML has an <address> or not and whether the corresponding
>> domain parse and post parse algorithms need to generate some sort
>> of address for the device.
>>
>>
>> John Ferlan (2):
>> qemu: Check for existing hostdev address for cold attach device
>> qemu: Use the correct vm def on cold attach
>>
>> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>
> ping?
>
> Can we come to a consensus either way on this? There's 2 that feel
> fixing the underlying problem is worth it (myself and Laine) and 1 that
> would not bother fixing the bug (Jano).