Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] docs: document freecell --all

On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:28:37AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > Based on a smaller patch developed by Moritoshi Oshiro: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693963 > > * tools/virsh.pod (freecell): Mention all, and clarify that > optional cellno requires --cellno. > --- > > I think this is the first case where virsh.pod is trying to convey > mutually exclusive options; does the resulting layout look > reasonable? I applied and checked with man, looks fine to me, ACK,