Hi,
> + */
> +GVirConfigDomainHostdevPci *gvir_config_domain_hostdev_pci_new(void)
> +{
> + GVirConfigObject *object;
> +
> + object = gvir_config_object_new(GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI,
> + "hostdev", NULL);
> + gvir_config_object_set_attribute(object, "mode",
"subsystem", NULL);
> + gvir_config_object_set_attribute(object, "type", "pci",
NULL);
> +
> + return GVIR_CONFIG_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI(object);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * gvir_config_domain_hostdev_pci_new_from_xml:
> + * @xml: xml data to create the host device from
> + * @error: return location for a #GError, or NULL
> + *
> + * Creates a new #GVirConfigDomainHostdevPci with a reference count of 1.
> + * The host device object will be created using the XML description stored
> + * in @xml. This is a fragment of libvirt domain XML whose root node is
> + * <hostdev>.
> + *
> + * Returns: a new #GVirConfigDomainHostdevPci, or NULL if @xml failed to
> + * be parsed.
> + */
> +GVirConfigDomainHostdevPci *gvir_config_domain_hostdev_pci_new_from_xml(const gchar
*xml,
> + GError
**error)
> +{
> + GVirConfigObject *object;
> +
> + object = gvir_config_object_new_from_xml(GVIR_CONFIG_TYPE_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI,
> + "hostdev", NULL, xml,
error);
> + if (*error != NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (g_strcmp0(gvir_config_object_get_attribute(object, NULL, "type"),
"pci") != 0) {
> + g_object_unref(G_OBJECT(object));
> + g_return_val_if_reached(NULL);
> + }
> +
> + return GVIR_CONFIG_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI(object);
> +}
> +
> +void gvir_config_domain_hostdev_pci_set_address(GVirConfigDomainHostdevPci
*hostdev,
> + GVirConfigDomainAddressPci
*address)
> +{
> + GVirConfigObject *source;
> + GVirConfigObject *addr_object;
> + xmlNodePtr node;
> + xmlAttrPtr attr;
> +
> + g_return_if_fail(GVIR_CONFIG_IS_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI(hostdev));
> + g_return_if_fail(GVIR_CONFIG_IS_DOMAIN_ADDRESS_PCI(address));
> + addr_object = GVIR_CONFIG_OBJECT(address);
> + node = gvir_config_object_get_xml_node(addr_object);
> + g_return_if_fail(node != NULL);
> +
> + source = gvir_config_object_replace_child(GVIR_CONFIG_OBJECT(hostdev),
> + "source");
> + /* We can't just use GVirConfigDomainAddressPci's node, as is, since it
> + * contains a 'type' attribute that's not valid in this context. So
we
> + * create a copy for our use and just delete the 'type' node from it.
> + */
It took me a while to understand what this comment meant exactly, and
why this was needed. If I followed correctly, in libvirt RelaxNG schema,
the address for a PCI hostdev device is a 'pciaddress', which do not
have a 'type' attribute contrary to most other addresses. This means
that for the PCI address of a hostdev device, trying to set a 'type' attribute
will trigger errors from libvirt when it tries to parse the domain XML.
Yeah, I tried tried with `virsh edit` and it tells me xml doesn't
confirm to schema.
In my opinion, this is a libvirt bug that type="pci" is not
accepted
here as libvirt documentation says:
« Device Addresses
Many devices have an optional <address> sub-element to describe where
the device is placed on the virtual bus presented to the guest.[...]
Every address has a mandatory attribute type that describes which bus
the device is on. »
Maybe here things are a bit special as this address is not a direct
child of the <hostdev> element, but is contained within a <source>
element, but I still think it would be nicer of libvirt, and more
consistent to accept an optional type="pci" attribute here rather than
rejecting it. This would have spared us the ugly workaround below :(
Yeah but even if it's resolved in libvirt, we'd still want to have a
work around for older libvirt.
> +
> +const gchar *gvir_config_domain_hostdev_pci_get_rom(GVirConfigDomainHostdevPci
*hostdev,
> + gboolean *bar)
> +{
> + xmlNodePtr hostdev_node;
> + xmlNodePtr rom_node;
> + const gchar *bar_str;
> +
> + g_return_val_if_fail(GVIR_CONFIG_IS_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI(hostdev), NULL);
> +
> + hostdev_node = gvir_config_object_get_xml_node(GVIR_CONFIG_OBJECT(hostdev));
> + g_return_val_if_fail(hostdev_node != NULL, NULL);
> +
> + rom_node = gvir_config_xml_get_element(hostdev_node, "rom", NULL);
> + if (!rom_node || !(rom_node->children))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + bar_str = gvir_config_xml_get_attribute_content(rom_node, "bar");
> + if (g_strcmp0(bar_str, "on"))
> + *bar = TRUE;
> + else
> + *bar = FALSE;
> +
> + return (const char *) rom_node->children->content;
The filename is in the file attribute, it's not in the node content
(addressed in a patch I'm going to send by switching to using
GVirConfigObject helpers).
Regarding the API, I don't think there are other places in
libvirt-gconfig where we set (or get) 2 things with a single
setter/getter. Are these 2 parameters tightly coupled together?
It seems to me we could do something similar to the <os><type>
attributes ('arch' and 'machine'). These 2 attributes are set by 2
separate helpers, but these helpers are in the GVirConfigOs class:
gvir_config_domain_os_set_arch
gvir_config_domain_os_set_machine
Both 'arch' and 'machine' are separate attributes on the 'type'
node
but "bar" is an attribute of "rom" node, that I think is unlikely to
be used in isolation. If we keep this API, I think I should change
'rom' to be nullable. I see your point though and I don't have hard
feeling either way.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
________________________________________
Befriend GNOME:
http://www.gnome.org/friends/