On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:23:19AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 01:45:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >It would still be useful to have a chart describing what APIs are
> >implemented
> >by which driver though & any restrictions the impl may have.
>
> I'll have a go at this.
Yes that would be useful thanks ! But I'm afraid it may be painful to
maintain too, as the various case may increase and the state of the
drivers/hypervisors will evolve.
This is why library documentation should *always* mention what version
an API became supported/was added in. It's utterly miserable trying to
use an evolving library otherwise :)
regards
john