On 10/27/2011 04:15 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:17:59PM +0800, ajia(a)redhat.com wrote:
> From: Alex Jia<ajia(a)redhat.com>
>
> Cppcheck detected a syntaxError on lxcDomainInterfaceStats.
>
> * src/lxc/lxc_driver.c: fixed missing '{' in the function
lxcDomainInterfaceStats.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Jia<ajia(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc_driver.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
> index f08e8d1..06bfa85 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
> @@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ static int
> lxcDomainInterfaceStats(virDomainPtr dom,
> const char *path ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> struct _virDomainInterfaceStats *stats ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> +{
> lxcError(VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT, "%s", __FUNCTION__);
> return -1;
> }
Hmm, I dunno why we even have a '#ifdef __linux__' in that file
since the entire file is Linux specific. We should just kill this
#else clause entirely
You mean we should remove the following lines rather then
reserving the
function as
a optional branch:
#else
static int
lxcDomainInterfaceStats(virDomainPtr dom,
const char *path ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
struct _virDomainInterfaceStats *stats
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
lxcError(VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT, "%s", __FUNCTION__);
return -1;
}
If so, need I commit a v2 patch for this?
Thanks for your review,
Alex
Daniel