On 28.01.2016 16:27, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 15:49:48 +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
> The error paths after fix suppose ret == -1 as at the
> beginning of the function.
>
> The better fix would be not to touch 'ret' at all until
> the end of the function where it is set to 0. Thus we'd
> better introduce some 'rc' variable to hold return
> values of called functions.
Exactly, it would be much better the way you describe, so why didn't you
do it that way? :-)
Ok)
NACK to this patch.
Jirka
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list