On 05/02/2016 10:41 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:09:26PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 04/29/2016 10:01 AM, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
>> The default USB controller is not sent to destination as the older versions
>> of libvirt(0.9.4 or earlier as I see in commit log of 409b5f54) didn't
>> support them. For some archs where the support started much later can
>> safely send the USB controllers without this worry. So, send the controller
>> to destination for all archs except x86. Moreover this is not very applicable
>> to x86 as the USB controller has model ich9_ehci1 on q35 and for pc-i440fx,
>> there cant be any slots before USB as it is fixed on slot 1.
>>
>> The patch fixes a bug that, if the USB controller happens to occupy
>> a slot after disks/interfaces and one of them is hot-unplugged, then
>> the default USB controller added on destination takes the smallest slot
>> number and that would lead to savestate mismatch and migration
>> failure. Seen and verified on PPC64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
>> index 6262bfe..963ff35 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
>> @@ -2599,7 +2599,11 @@ qemuDomainDefFormatBuf(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
>> usb = def->controllers[i];
>> }
>> }
>> - if (usb && usb->idx == 0 && usb->model == -1) {
>> + /* The original purpose of the check was the migration compatibility
>> + * with libvirt <= 0.9.4. Limitation doesn't apply to other
archs
>> + * and can cause problems on PPC64.
>> + *
>> + if (ARCH_IS_X86(def->os.arch) && usb && usb->idx
== 0 && usb->model == -1) {
As of commit fcbfd50:
qemu: only check for PIIX3-specific device addrs on pc-* machinetypes
we only check that the controller is on slot 1 for PIIX3 machines,
so qemuDomainMachineIsI440FX(def) should also be one of the conditions.
It is possible to specify a usb controller with model='-1' on q35 too,
but I do not know if anyone actually uses it in the wild.
I have a vague memory of searching through for the possible ways that
model could be -1 and coming up with the answer "almost never". As for
Q35 specifically - support was added for PCIe controllers required by
Q35 in libvirt 1.1.2, so any configuration for a Q35 domain wouldn't
work if you tried to move it to a system with a libvirt old enough to
require removing the usb controller from the XML.
This removal was useful at the time it was added, but at this point, do
we really expect that anyone is going to be successful migrating a
running virtual machine from a system running libvirt 1.3.4 to a system
with libvirt that is 0.9.4 or less (or downgrading their libvirt by that
many revisions)? Is there a use for doing it at all?