On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 15:43:57 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jiri Denemark
<jdenemar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 14:37:40 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> FWIW, I keep the patchset that I push into Gentoo now in a bit
>> friendlier place to access:
>>
>>
http://git.cardoe.com/?p=libvirt.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/v1.0.2-maint
>>
>> Due to Gentoo "supporting" each release of libvirt, we'll have a
>> stable branch for every release that others are welcome to follow or
>> look at or make suggestions to include.
>
> Doug, any reason for not having them in upstream libvirt git? We already
> have maint branches for some releases, which happen to be the releases
> present in Fedora and the main reason for that is the people maintaining
> them are mostly interested in Fedora. But we encourage others that are
> interested in having maint branches for other releases to do so. And the
> nice thing about it is, that if an ugly bug that has been present in
> libvirt for a long time may be fixed in all maint branches at once even
> by people who are really interested in just some of them.
>
> Jirka
No reason not to. I'll gladly add them if people would like that.
Sure, just create v1.0.2-maint branch in upstream git repository and
cherry-pick patches there. It's possible git won't let you push the
branch, in which case let us know and we'll solve it.
Jirka