On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 10:25 -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
With the advent of VIR_PCI_CONNECT_AGGREGATE_SLOT, the new name is
more appropriate, since the address contained may be another address
s/contained/returned/ ?
on the same slot as last time, not necessarily a new slot.
ACK
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization