On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 19:53:50 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:37:20 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:58:06 +0200
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:52:51 -0600
> > Alex Williamson <alex.williamson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Based on the discussions we've had, I've rewritten the bulk of
> > > mdevctl. I think it largely does everything we want now, modulo
> > > devices that will need some sort of 1:N values per key for
> > > configuration in the config file versus the 1:1 key:value setup we
> > > currently have (so don't consider the format final just yet).
> >
> > We might want to factor out that config format handling while we're
> > trying to finalize it.
> >
> > cc:ing Matt for his awareness. I'm currently not quite sure how to
> > handle those vfio-ap "write several values to an attribute one at a
> > time" requirements. Maybe 1:N key:value is the way to go; maybe we
> > need/want JSON or something like that.
>
> Maybe we should just do JSON for future flexibility. I assume there
> are lots of helpers that should make it easy even from a bash script.
> I'll look at that next.
Done. Throw away any old mdev config files, we use JSON now.
The code changes look quite straightforward, thanks.
The per
mdev config now looks like this:
{
"mdev_type": "i915-GVTg_V4_8",
"start": "auto"
}
My expectation, and what I've already pre-enabled support in set_key
and get_key functions, is that we'd use arrays for values, so we might
have:
"new_key": ["value1", "value2"]
set_key will automatically convert a comma separated list of values
into such an array, so I'm thinking this would be specified by the user
as:
# mdevctl modify -u UUID --key=new_key --value=value1,value2
Looks sensible.
For vfio-ap, we'd probably end up with something like the following:
{
"mdev_type": "vfio_ap-passthrough",
"start": "auto",
"assign_adapter": ["5", "6"],
"assign_domain": ["4", "0xab"]
}
(following the Guest1 example in the kernel documentation)
<As an aside, what should happen if e.g "assign_adapter" is set to
["6", "7"]? Remove 5, add 7? Remove all values, then set the new
ones?
Similar for deleting the "assign_adapter" key. We have an
"unassign_adapter" attribute, but this is not something we can infer
automatically; we need to know that we're dealing with an vfio-ap
matrix device...>
We should think about whether ordering is important and maybe
incorporate that into key naming conventions or come up with some
syntax for specifying startup blocks. Thanks,
Alex
Hm...
{
"foo": "1",
"bar": "42",
"baz": {
"depends": ["foo", "bar"],
"value": "plahh"
}
}
Something like that?