On 16/05/13 22:44, Ján Tomko wrote:
On 05/14/2013 02:56 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
> On 14/05/13 17:29, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> On 05/14/2013 11:03 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
>>> The reason for it's not exposed for such long time is that there is
>>> no xml2xml test for it. This fixes the bug and adds test.
>> It was not exposed, because virDomainVirtioEventIdx and
>> virDomainDiskCopyOnRead enums are the same.
> Oh, right,
>
>> Maybe we should use enum virDomainFeatureState for both instead?
>>
>>
> It's something I planned to clean up, together with rng schemas. E.g.
>
> <optional>
> <attribute name="dumpCore">
> <choice>
> <value>on</value>
> <value>off</value>
> </choice>
> </attribute>
> </optional>
>
> The principle is to define a common datatype and use it for all of the similar
> attributes, same principle for the enums in domain_conf.[ch].
>
> But anyway, it's another story, and this patch is a right fix.
>
Oh, sorry, I forgot to ACK it.
ACK if you change the commit message so it doesn't imply that the test exposes
the bug.
Thanks, I pushed with the commit log updated.
Osier