2:24 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464313
As it turns out, the on-disk config file (e.g. not the stateDir file)
needs to be updated when --override is provided since it's possible and
highly probable that the def->source.format has been adjusted and could
cause a future start after perhaps a libvirtd restart to have the older
format from a define operation from the backend.
So in the 2 places where it's possible a write would be needed (create
after define and build), let's perform a check and do the save/write
operation on the configFile if it's necessary.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
---
src/storage/storage_driver.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_driver.c b/src/storage/storage_driver.c
index 7cf5943..afb0404 100644
--- a/src/storage/storage_driver.c
+++ b/src/storage/storage_driver.c
@@ -651,6 +651,22 @@ storagePoolIsPersistent(virStoragePoolPtr pool)
}
+/* After a pool build, it's possible the inactive configFile needs to
+ * be updated especially since overwriting the pool more than likely
+ * changes the source format and may change/update a few other fields. */
+static int
+storagePoolBuildCheckUpdateConfig(virStoragePoolObjPtr obj,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if ((flags & VIR_STORAGE_POOL_BUILD_OVERWRITE) && obj->configFile)
+ ret = virStoragePoolSaveConfig(obj->configFile, obj->def);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
static virStoragePoolPtr
storagePoolCreateXML(virConnectPtr conn,
const char *xml,
@@ -916,6 +932,9 @@ storagePoolCreate(virStoragePoolPtr pool,
if (backend->buildPool(pool->conn, obj, build_flags) < 0)
goto cleanup;
}
+
+ if (storagePoolBuildCheckUpdateConfig(obj, build_flags) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
}
VIR_INFO("Starting up storage pool '%s'", obj->def->name);
@@ -980,6 +999,10 @@ storagePoolBuild(virStoragePoolPtr pool,
if (backend->buildPool &&
backend->buildPool(pool->conn, obj, flags) < 0)
goto cleanup;
+
+ if (storagePoolBuildCheckUpdateConfig(obj, flags) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
ret = 0;
cleanup:
--
2.9.5
6:34 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 15:24:18 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464313
As it turns out, the on-disk config file (e.g. not the stateDir file)
needs to be updated when --override is provided since it's possible and
highly probable that the def->source.format has been adjusted and could
cause a future start after perhaps a libvirtd restart to have the older
format from a define operation from the backend.
So in the 2 places where it's possible a write would be needed (create
after define and build), let's perform a check and do the save/write
operation on the configFile if it's necessary.
I don't think this is correct. If you use the "create" API with a custom
XML this should not in any way touch the persistent config of the pool,
similarly as we do with VMs. The provided XML may describe a completely
different storage pool and using the 'create' API should not overwrite
anything stored persistently.
If a user messes up the storage state via the live config, he needs to
fix everything by themselves.
This would just overwrite persistent config which is not desired.
NACK
7:18 a.m.
On 09/11/2017 07:34 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 15:24:18 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464313
>
> As it turns out, the on-disk config file (e.g. not the stateDir file)
> needs to be updated when --override is provided since it's possible and
> highly probable that the def->source.format has been adjusted and could
> cause a future start after perhaps a libvirtd restart to have the older
> format from a define operation from the backend.
>
> So in the 2 places where it's possible a write would be needed (create
> after define and build), let's perform a check and do the save/write
> operation on the configFile if it's necessary.
I don't think this is correct. If you use the "create" API with a custom
XML this should not in any way touch the persistent config of the pool,
similarly as we do with VMs. The provided XML may describe a completely
different storage pool and using the 'create' API should not overwrite
anything stored persistently.
If a user messes up the storage state via the live config, he needs to
fix everything by themselves.
This would just overwrite persistent config which is not desired.
NACK
To both Create and Build or just Create?
Not sure I can visualize the Create path noted above, but it's still
early in the morning with not enough coffee yet. Still the logic to
decide to write out the config file is gated on whether the caller
wanted overwrite (via VIR_STORAGE_POOL_BUILD_OVERWRITE flag being
provided), but unlike VM's there's no flags to indicate whether we're
"active" or "inactive".
So if someone has indicated to use the overwrite flag, then that says to
me all bets are off and not only should the live config be updated (as
it is), but the on disk config as well since the decision by the
consumer is to overwrite.
Without doing so we end up with an unusable pool the next time we start
which is the crux of the bz.
John
7:55 a.m.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 08:18:41 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/11/2017 07:34 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 15:24:18 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464313
>>
>> As it turns out, the on-disk config file (e.g. not the stateDir file)
>> needs to be updated when --override is provided since it's possible and
>> highly probable that the def->source.format has been adjusted and could
>> cause a future start after perhaps a libvirtd restart to have the older
>> format from a define operation from the backend.
>>
>> So in the 2 places where it's possible a write would be needed (create
>> after define and build), let's perform a check and do the save/write
>> operation on the configFile if it's necessary.
>
> I don't think this is correct. If you use the "create" API with a
custom
> XML this should not in any way touch the persistent config of the pool,
> similarly as we do with VMs. The provided XML may describe a completely
> different storage pool and using the 'create' API should not overwrite
> anything stored persistently.
>
> If a user messes up the storage state via the live config, he needs to
> fix everything by themselves.
>
> This would just overwrite persistent config which is not desired.
>
> NACK
>
To both Create and Build or just Create?
This was for CreateXML but you are changing just "Create" which makes
more sense, since that only touches the config which was already
defined. I've mistaken those two, since CreateXML was at the end of the
context of the first hunk. The code addition is actually in a different
function.
But that leads to another question ... why is that even necessary? If
you are overwriting a disk, then the source format (and all possible
other config) should be taken from what is provided in the definition
which already exists (that is the persistent config) and thus no
update should be required.
Not sure I can visualize the Create path noted above, but it's
still
early in the morning with not enough coffee yet. Still the logic to
decide to write out the config file is gated on whether the caller
wanted overwrite (via VIR_STORAGE_POOL_BUILD_OVERWRITE flag being
provided), but unlike VM's there's no flags to indicate whether we're
"active" or "inactive".
virStoragePoolObjPtr->active? Some pools can't be inactive, but e.g.
gluster pools can, so that is not universally true.
So if someone has indicated to use the overwrite flag, then that says
to
me all bets are off and not only should the live config be updated (as
it is), but the on disk config as well since the decision by the
consumer is to overwrite.
In such case the live config should be completely deleted and replaced
by new config which is based on the persistent config. Same way as when
we start VMs.
Without doing so we end up with an unusable pool the next time we
start
which is the crux of the bz.
I think the root cause here is somewhere else. If we are adding anything
automatic (e.g. the format), it should be recorded in the original
config (and XML) and not overwritten once you are going to build/start
it.
Since I was mistaken I'm retracting the NACK, but I still think this
patch is not justified enough. Rewriting of the persistent config should
not be necessary.
4:09 p.m.
On 09/11/2017 08:55 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 08:18:41 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 09/11/2017 07:34 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 15:24:18 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464313
>>>
>>> As it turns out, the on-disk config file (e.g. not the stateDir file)
>>> needs to be updated when --override is provided since it's possible and
>>> highly probable that the def->source.format has been adjusted and could
>>> cause a future start after perhaps a libvirtd restart to have the older
>>> format from a define operation from the backend.
>>>
>>> So in the 2 places where it's possible a write would be needed (create
>>> after define and build), let's perform a check and do the save/write
>>> operation on the configFile if it's necessary.
>>
>> I don't think this is correct. If you use the "create" API with a
custom
>> XML this should not in any way touch the persistent config of the pool,
>> similarly as we do with VMs. The provided XML may describe a completely
>> different storage pool and using the 'create' API should not overwrite
>> anything stored persistently.
>>
>> If a user messes up the storage state via the live config, he needs to
>> fix everything by themselves.
>>
>> This would just overwrite persistent config which is not desired.
>>
>> NACK
>>
>
> To both Create and Build or just Create?
This was for CreateXML but you are changing just "Create" which makes
more sense, since that only touches the config which was already
defined. I've mistaken those two, since CreateXML was at the end of the
context of the first hunk. The code addition is actually in a different
function.
But that leads to another question ... why is that even necessary? If
you are overwriting a disk, then the source format (and all possible
other config) should be taken from what is provided in the definition
which already exists (that is the persistent config) and thus no
update should be required.
On input "format" is optional. It's only used for some pools and
"default" values at definition/parse time written out based on a table
in storage_conf.c
The storage_conf format definition for a disk pool is:
...
static virStoragePoolTypeInfo poolTypeInfo[] = {
...
{.poolType = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_DISK,
.poolOptions = {
.flags = (VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_DEVICE),
.defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_DISK_UNKNOWN,
...
Thus, if not supplied, the value written out is "unknown". For
comparison, other build-able pool types:
...
{.poolType = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_LOGICAL,
...
.defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_LOGICAL_LVM2,
...
{.poolType = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_FS,
...
.defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_FS_AUTO,
...
{.poolType = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_ZFS,
...
.defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_FILE_RAW,
...
{.poolType = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_VSTORAGE,
...
.defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_FILE_RAW,
...
We could alter the default format to be VIR_STORAGE_POOL_DISK_DOS so
that when not specified, "dos" is written out at define time. This
follows how the others do things. It could be argued they break the
rules having the define/parse/format code perform the adjustment rather
than having that adjustment only occur in the storage backend.
Still if someone does supply "unknown" in the input XML, then the output
has "unknown" as well since virStoragePoolDefParseSource finds something
in the format type field.
> Not sure I can visualize the Create path noted above, but
it's still
> early in the morning with not enough coffee yet. Still the logic to
> decide to write out the config file is gated on whether the caller
> wanted overwrite (via VIR_STORAGE_POOL_BUILD_OVERWRITE flag being
> provided), but unlike VM's there's no flags to indicate whether we're
> "active" or "inactive".
virStoragePoolObjPtr->active? Some pools can't be inactive, but e.g.
gluster pools can, so that is not universally true.
> So if someone has indicated to use the overwrite flag, then that says to
> me all bets are off and not only should the live config be updated (as
> it is), but the on disk config as well since the decision by the
> consumer is to overwrite.
In such case the live config should be completely deleted and replaced
by new config which is based on the persistent config. Same way as when
we start VMs.
> Without doing so we end up with an unusable pool the next time we start
> which is the crux of the bz.
I think the root cause here is somewhere else. If we are adding anything
automatic (e.g. the format), it should be recorded in the original
config (and XML) and not overwritten once you are going to build/start
it.
Some more digging and experimenting led me to adjusting the Disk Start
code to check if the config has UNKNOWN, then "assume" DOS and try the
start (similar to the build code finds UNKNOWN and uses DOS).
I don't think changing the storage_conf to use _DOS as the defaultFormat
is really right, but if you believe so I have no issue altering that as
well....
Since I was mistaken I'm retracting the NACK, but I still think this
patch is not justified enough. Rewriting of the persistent config should
not be necessary.
I'll send a v2 in a bit. It won't change the persistent on disk format,
but will allow the start to occur and to have the expected format displayed.
John
2660
days inactive
2665
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
John Ferlan -
Peter Krempa