On 2013年07月29日 21:04, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 13:23:23 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 15:41:19 +0800, Li Zhang wrote:
>> From: Li Zhang <zhlcindy(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> CPU data structure is refined, which causes one compile error for PPC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <zhlcindy(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> src/cpu/cpu_powerpc.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_powerpc.c b/src/cpu/cpu_powerpc.c
>> index 62437d3..55a4153 100644
>> --- a/src/cpu/cpu_powerpc.c
>> +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_powerpc.c
>> @@ -354,15 +354,15 @@ ppcDataFree(virCPUDataPtr data)
>> static virCPUDataPtr
>> ppcNodeData(void)
>> {
>> - virCPUDataPtr data;
>> + virCPUDataPtr cpuData;
>>
>> - if (VIR_ALLOC(data) < 0)
>> + if (VIR_ALLOC(cpuData) < 0)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> asm("mfpvr %0"
>> - : "=r" (data->ppc.pvr));
>> + : "=r" (cpuData->data.ppc.pvr));
>>
>> - return data;
>> + return cpuData;
>> }
>> #endif
> I'm fine with this change but what compile error does this fix? The only
> error I could think of is shadowing a global "data" symbol but I doubt
> that's the case as the same structure is called "data" in several
other
> functions in cpu_powerpc.c
Oh, I see it now. The bug was that data->ppc.pvr should have been
data->data.ppc.pvr. This makes more sense now... I blame the hot
weather.
Yes, that's it. I saw a union is added to virCPUData.
Jirka