5:20 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote:
> Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm.
[...]
> +# For glusterfs
> +Requires: glusterfs-client >= 2.0.2
> %endif
why 2.0.2 ? is taht a hard requirement ? In Fedora/Rawhide we have
only 2.0.1 at the moment,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel veillard com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
Tested
libvirt-0.7.0 today.
And this requirement really breaks installation of builds on RHEL/CentOS/ScientificLinux.
The newest available built for glusterfs is those systems is glusterfs-client-1.3.8 from
freshrpms.
Even --without-storage-fs does not help a bit, must be pulled in implicitly?
rpm -pq --requires libvirt-0.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm
(...)
glusterfs-client >= 2.0.1
(...)
Is this patched in upcoming 0.7.1 or how could i go around this issue?
10:17 p.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency
Hi Gerrit,
Problem i can see here is the CentOS, RHEL and Scientific Linux never
really built a package for 2.x releases of glusterfs and 1.3.x is really
almost 2yr+ old.
Having a dependency moved to 1.3.8 will actually break everything which
glusterfs provides. 2.x are incompatible with 1.3.x releases, i would
suggest a package upgrade bugzilla ticket against the CentOS/RHEL
maintainers for glusterfs packages. Fact is 1.3.x has been not supported by
us since long time now as there
were no new developments in that branch.
Regards
--
Harshavardhana
Gluster - http://www.gluster.com
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Gerrit Slomma <roadrunner_gs(a)web.de> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote:
> > Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm.
> [...]
> > +# For glusterfs > +Requires: glusterfs-client >= 2.0.2
> > %endif
>
> why 2.0.2 ? is taht a hard requirement ? In Fedora/Rawhide we have
> only 2.0.1 at the moment,
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
> daniel veillard com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
> http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
>
Tested libvirt-0.7.0 today.
And this requirement really breaks installation of builds on
RHEL/CentOS/ScientificLinux.
The newest available built for glusterfs is those systems is
glusterfs-client-1.3.8 from freshrpms.
Even --without-storage-fs does not help a bit, must be pulled in
implicitly?
rpm -pq --requires libvirt-0.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm
(...)
glusterfs-client >= 2.0.1
(...)
Is this patched in upcoming 0.7.1 or how could i go around this issue?
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
5:51 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Gerrit Slomma wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote:
>> Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm.
>[...]
>> +# For glusterfs
>> +Requires: glusterfs-client >= 2.0.2
>> %endif
>
> why 2.0.2 ? is taht a hard requirement ? In Fedora/Rawhide we have
>only 2.0.1 at the moment,
Tested libvirt-0.7.0 today.
And this requirement really breaks installation of builds on
RHEL/CentOS/ScientificLinux.
The newest available built for glusterfs is those systems is
glusterfs-client-1.3.8 from freshrpms.
Even --without-storage-fs does not help a bit, must be pulled in implicitly?
No, its an explicitly RPM dependancy
rpm -pq --requires libvirt-0.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm
(...)
glusterfs-client >= 2.0.1
(...)
Is this patched in upcoming 0.7.1 or how could i go around this issue?
We should hjust make this dependancy conditional onn fedora >= 11, since
no earlier Fedora or RHEL has this available.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
8:01 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] RPM spec file updated with glusterfs dependency
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Gerrit Slomma wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:56AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote:
> >> Add new dependency for glusterfs rpm.
> >[...]
> >> +# For glusterfs
> >> +Requires: glusterfs-client >= 2.0.2
> >> %endif
> >
> > why 2.0.2 ? is taht a hard requirement ? In Fedora/Rawhide we have
> >only 2.0.1 at the moment,
>
> Tested libvirt-0.7.0 today.
> And this requirement really breaks installation of builds on
> RHEL/CentOS/ScientificLinux.
> The newest available built for glusterfs is those systems is
> glusterfs-client-1.3.8 from freshrpms.
> Even --without-storage-fs does not help a bit, must be pulled in implicitly?
No, its an explicitly RPM dependancy
> rpm -pq --requires libvirt-0.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm
> (...)
> glusterfs-client >= 2.0.1
> (...)
>
> Is this patched in upcoming 0.7.1 or how could i go around this issue?
We should hjust make this dependancy conditional onn fedora >= 11, since
no earlier Fedora or RHEL has this available.
I see this was fixed in git, cool,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
5560
days inactive
5565
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daniel P. Berrange -
Daniel Veillard -
Gerrit Slomma -
Harshavardhana