On 02/16/2017 01:24 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 02/15/2017 05:06 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 11:41 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> Joao Martins wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins(a)oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml
>>> index b756a97..b0629b5 100644
>>> --- a/docs/news.xml
>>> +++ b/docs/news.xml
>>> @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@
>>> was <code>virtio-net</code>.
>>> </description>
>>> </change>
>>> + <change>
>>> + <summary>
>>> + libxl: add tunnelled migration support
>>> + </summary>
>>> + <description>
>>> + Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable
of
>>> + strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network
connection
>>> + other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd.
>>> + </description>
>>> + </change>
>>> </section>
>>> <section title="Improvements">
>>> <change>
>>
>> Pushed, but only after realizing tunneled is misspelled :-(. No use perpetuating
>> the misspelling of tunneled, so I've pushed a trivial followup.
>
> Interesting, I didn't know that. Greping the whole repo for "tunnelled"
and you
> will find a *lot* of matches:
>
> $ git grep tunneled | wc -l
> 10
> $ git grep tunnelled | wc -l
> 1242
So the incorrect spelling is used over 100x more than the correct one :-)
Hehe :D
> Hmm, but the internets aren't really clear. Some hits say
tunneled vs tunnelled
> being both correct.
Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to
recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks prefer I
can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit.
Sorry I may have mis-expressed myself before - didn't meant this being an issue.
I was just curious about the word because I made that same mistake throughout
the patches. Probably there's no need for revert with both appearing correct (as
folks are suggesting in followup messages)
Joao