Commit 5b3492fa aimed to fix this and caught one error but exposed
another one. When agent command is being executed and the thread
waiting for the reply is woken up by an event (e.g. EOF in case of
shutdown), the command finishes with no data (rxObject == NULL), but
no error is reported, since this might be desired by the caller
(e.g. suspend through agent). However, in other situations, when the
data are required (e.g. getting vCPUs), we proceed to getting desired
data out of the reply, but none of the virJSON*() functions works well
with NULLs. I chose the way of a new parameter for qemuAgentCommand()
function that specifies whether reply is required and behaves
according to that.
Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058149
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
---
Notes:
This issue probably exists since qemu-ga is supported in libvirt, so
this (along with 5b3492fa and e9d09fe1) might be worth back-porting to
some maintenance branches, I just haven't gone through them to see
which ones are applicable.
src/qemu/qemu_agent.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_agent.c b/src/qemu/qemu_agent.c
index 92573bd..4082331 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_agent.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_agent.c
@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ static int
qemuAgentCommand(qemuAgentPtr mon,
virJSONValuePtr cmd,
virJSONValuePtr *reply,
+ bool needReply,
int seconds)
{
int ret = -1;
@@ -1111,7 +1112,7 @@ qemuAgentCommand(qemuAgentPtr mon,
/* If we haven't obtained any reply but we wait for an
* event, then don't report this as error */
if (!msg.rxObject) {
- if (await_event) {
+ if (await_event && !needReply) {
VIR_DEBUG("Woken up by event %d", await_event);
} else {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
@@ -1275,7 +1276,7 @@ int qemuAgentShutdown(qemuAgentPtr mon,
mon->await_event = QEMU_AGENT_EVENT_RESET;
else
mon->await_event = QEMU_AGENT_EVENT_SHUTDOWN;
- ret = qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply,
+ ret = qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply, false,
VIR_DOMAIN_QEMU_AGENT_COMMAND_BLOCK);
virJSONValueFree(cmd);
@@ -1305,7 +1306,7 @@ int qemuAgentFSFreeze(qemuAgentPtr mon)
if (!cmd)
return -1;
- if (qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply,
+ if (qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply, true,
VIR_DOMAIN_QEMU_AGENT_COMMAND_BLOCK) < 0)
goto cleanup;
@@ -1342,7 +1343,7 @@ int qemuAgentFSThaw(qemuAgentPtr mon)
if (!cmd)
return -1;
- if (qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply,
+ if (qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply, true,
VIR_DOMAIN_QEMU_AGENT_COMMAND_BLOCK) < 0)
goto cleanup;
@@ -1379,7 +1380,7 @@ qemuAgentSuspend(qemuAgentPtr mon,
return -1;
mon->await_event = QEMU_AGENT_EVENT_SUSPEND;
- ret = qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply,
+ ret = qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply, false,
VIR_DOMAIN_QEMU_AGENT_COMMAND_BLOCK);
virJSONValueFree(cmd);
@@ -1409,7 +1410,7 @@ qemuAgentArbitraryCommand(qemuAgentPtr mon,
if (!(cmd = virJSONValueFromString(cmd_str)))
goto cleanup;
- if ((ret = qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply, timeout)) < 0)
+ if ((ret = qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply, true, timeout)) < 0)
goto cleanup;
if (!(*result = virJSONValueToString(reply, false)))
@@ -1436,7 +1437,7 @@ qemuAgentFSTrim(qemuAgentPtr mon,
if (!cmd)
return ret;
- ret = qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply,
+ ret = qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply, false,
VIR_DOMAIN_QEMU_AGENT_COMMAND_BLOCK);
virJSONValueFree(cmd);
@@ -1458,7 +1459,7 @@ qemuAgentGetVCPUs(qemuAgentPtr mon,
if (!(cmd = qemuAgentMakeCommand("guest-get-vcpus", NULL)))
return -1;
- if (qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply,
+ if (qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply, true,
VIR_DOMAIN_QEMU_AGENT_COMMAND_BLOCK) < 0)
goto cleanup;
@@ -1566,7 +1567,7 @@ qemuAgentSetVCPUs(qemuAgentPtr mon,
cpus = NULL;
- if (qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply,
+ if (qemuAgentCommand(mon, cmd, &reply, true,
VIR_DOMAIN_QEMU_AGENT_COMMAND_BLOCK) < 0)
goto cleanup;
From code logic, this patch seems to be the right answer for bug 1058149.
To verify it, I'll do a test with my bug reproducing scripts.
Thanks for Martin's help about this problem.