On 08/28/2014 11:20 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>
> I am going to remove this one from my series and let you handle it.
>
After looking at the code again, I think it is safest to go with your patch.
> I would seem perhaps that the code was there to ensure that if either of
> the calls to virDomainObjSetState() ended up resulting in 'dom' not
> returning something from the virGetDomain(), then like perhaps the qemu
> migration code, the "best choice" was to remove it.
Yep, agreed. I haven't convinced myself that it is impossible for
virGetDomain() to return a NULL domainPtr, but in the event it does I
agree it is best to remove the domain.
Regards,
Jim
Close enough to an ACK for me ;-)
I've pushed the change
Thanks
John