On 2018年11月06日 16:18, Huaqiang,Wang wrote:
On 2018年11月05日 23:01, John Ferlan wrote:
>
> On 10/22/18 4:01 AM, Wang Huaqiang wrote:
>> Refactor schemas and virresctrl to support optional <cache> element
>> in <cachetune>.
>>
>> Later, the monitor entry will be introduced and to be placed
>> under <cachetune>. Either cache entry or monitor entry is
>> an optional element of <cachetune>.
>>
>> An cachetune has no <cache> element is taking the default resource
>> allocating policy defined in '/sys/fs/resctrl/schemata'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Huaqiang <huaqiang.wang(a)intel.com>
>> ---
>> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 4 ++--
>> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 4 ++--
>> src/util/virresctrl.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
> [...]
>
>> + /* If the allocation is empty, then the path will be
>> SYSFS_RESCTRL_PATH */
>> + if (virResctrlAllocIsEmpty(alloc)) {
>> + if (!alloc->path &&
>> + VIR_STRDUP(alloc->path, SYSFS_RESCTRL_PATH) < 0)
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
> Because of ...
>
>> if (!alloc->path &&
>> virAsprintf(&alloc->path, "%s/%s-%s",
>> SYSFS_RESCTRL_PATH, machinename, alloc->id) < 0)
> [...]
>
>> @@ -2334,6 +2358,10 @@ virResctrlAllocRemove(virResctrlAllocPtr alloc)
>> {
>> int ret = 0;
>> + /* No directory have ever been created. Just return */
>> + if (virResctrlAllocIsEmpty(alloc))
>> + return 0;
> ... the change to virResctrlAllocDeterminePath to fill in alloc->path
> when virResctrlAllocIsEmpty to be a default path, this should be:
>
> if (STREQ_NULLABLE(alloc->path, SYSFS_RESCTRL_PATH))
> return 0;
>
> or moved after the next check and the _NULLABLE removed.
>
> Whether the AllocIsEmpty is true or not shouldn't be the bearing on
> whether the directory created because of that
Agree with the changes.
"No need to create a directory that has already been created by system."
(SYSFS_RESCTRL_PATH is the created directory).
Should be "no need to destroy a system created directory, the
SYSFS_RESCTRL_PATH.
Directory SYSFS_RESCTRL_PATH is governed by system."
It might also be reasonable to make similar changes for
virResctrlAllocCreate,
because no need to create an already created directory, Right? And
*alloc->path must
be properly assigned, by virResctrlAllocDeterminePath, before a call of
virResctrlAllocCreate.
>> +
>> if (!alloc->path)
>> return 0;
>>
> I can adjust for you, let me know; otherwise, things are fine for the
>
> Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
>
> John
Thanks for the review.
Huaqiang