On 06/11/2014 01:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 01:04:02PM +0300, Laine Stump wrote:
> I had thought that what was required was the ability to roundtrip the
> *inactive* xml back into a define, not the status XML. If it's really a
> requirement that we be able to feed back the output of the status XML to
> get the exact same domain, then I think I've made a big mistake :-/
Yes, you're right actually. I should have clarified I meant inactive
XML.
Whew! I feel much better now :-)