On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Shalini Chellathurai Saroja wrote:
Add replies and xml files for QEMU 6.0.0 on s390x.
Signed-off-by: Shalini Chellathurai Saroja<shalini(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk<bwalk(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski<fiuczy(a)linux.ibm.com>
---
The replies file is removed from this patch and is available in
https://gitlab.com/shalinichellathurai/libvirt/-/commit/ad5883c66c80e9945...
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_6.0.0.s390x.xml | 238 +
.../caps_6.0.0.s390x.replies | 27084 ++++++++++++++++
.../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0.s390x.xml | 3304 ++
...default-video-type-s390x.s390x-latest.args | 6 +-
.../disk-error-policy-s390x.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
.../fs9p-ccw.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
...tdev-subsys-mdev-vfio-ap.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
...ubsys-mdev-vfio-ccw-boot.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
...othreads-virtio-scsi-ccw.s390x-latest.args | 8 +-
...t-cpu-kvm-ccw-virtio-2.7.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
...t-cpu-kvm-ccw-virtio-4.2.s390x-latest.args | 6 +-
...t-cpu-tcg-ccw-virtio-2.7.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
...t-cpu-tcg-ccw-virtio-4.2.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
.../s390x-ccw-graphics.s390x-latest.args | 6 +-
.../s390x-ccw-headless.s390x-latest.args | 6 +-
.../vhost-vsock-ccw-auto.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
.../vhost-vsock-ccw-iommu.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
.../vhost-vsock-ccw.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
18 files changed, 30662 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_6.0.0.s390x.xml
create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0.s390x.replies
create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0.s390x.xml
Overall looks reasonable, but comparing the computed capabilities
with those for QEMU 5.2 highlights a couple of changes that I'm not
so sure about, specifically
--- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.2.0.s390x.xml 2021-05-12
10:52:29.826021415 +0200
+++ tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0.s390x.xml 2021-05-12
17:39:47.778445212 +0200
@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@
<flag name='disk-share-rw'/>
<flag name='iscsi.password-secret'/>
<flag name='dump-completed'/>
- <flag name='virtio-gpu-ccw'/>
@@ -115,7 +114,6 @@
<flag name='iothread.poll-max-ns'/>
<flag name='egl-headless.rendernode'/>
<flag name='memory-backend-file.align'/>
- <flag name='memory-backend-file.pmem'/>
Because of the former I would expect the s390x-ccw-graphics xml2argv
test to fail, but it looks like we don't do a good job at validating
the <video> element and that QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU_CCW in
particular is completely unused.
As for the latter there doesn't seem to be any test coverage outside
of x86_64, so perhaps it would be a good idea to look into that?
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization