On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:06:08AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:26:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 08:10:33AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> > > > The Xen impl as coded only works for disks named xvdN, because the
code for
> > > > calculating device ID assumes xvdN device numbering scheme:
> > > >
> > > > device = 202 * 256 + minor;
> > >
> > > What's with device numbering at all? Must we really repeat this crazy
> > > Linuxism from xend in libvirt :(
> >
> > Do you have an alternative ? Because this is commited in CVS and I
> > would like to get 0.3.2 rolled out ASAP ! So if you have a practical
> > suggestion or a patch, please post it, I may delay the issue but
> > just stating 'crazy Linuxism' without specifying why and how this can
> > be fixed won't help.
>
> I just checked it out, and it looks like it can be safely encapsulated
> in this case. I was worried it would end up like xend but it seems we
> can entirely wrap the knowledge of this to be Linux-only.
Yeah we will need to #ifdef/#else on a per OS basis, which is not perfect
but this is still workable, as long as the API is clean I don't have too
much concerns.
> BTW I am a little concerned that we're re-implementing all this code
> when libxenstat can do it. I already wrote this code once :)
Ah :-) Well that's LGPL so we can probably reuse pieces of it. But
I don't feel too confident relying on an installed Xen library at this
point.
FYI, in case people didn't realize we can /use/ code from libxenstat. We
can't link it though, because libxenstat links to libxc and thus the result
becomes GPL.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|