When specifying a new CPU model in cpu_map.xml as an extension to an
existing model, we forgot to copy the signature (family + model) from
the original CPU model.
We don't use this way of specifying CPU models, but it's still supported
and it becomes useful when someone wants to quickly hack up a CPU model
for testing or when creating additional variants of existing models to
help with fixing some spectral issues.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
---
src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
index 2a2f7cbf39..b2398c5ad2 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
@@ -1227,6 +1227,7 @@ x86ModelParse(xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt,
VIR_FREE(name);
model->vendor = ancestor->vendor;
+ model->signature = ancestor->signature;
if (x86DataCopy(&model->data, &ancestor->data) < 0)
goto error;
}
--
2.15.1