On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:32:04AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 10:08 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:01:03AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 18:23 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 18:05:17 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > > VIR_AUTOFREE char *str = NULL;
> > >
> > > For consistency I'd prefer if the argument is in parentheses
similarly
> > > to the ones below.
> >
> > Seconded.
>
> Well that would mean having this macro:
>
> #define VIR_AUTOFREE(type) __attribute__((cleanup(virFree))) type *
>
> and the usage would be:
>
> VIR_AUTOFREE(char) string = NULL;
>
> Yes, for consistency it make sense but sometimes exception makes it look
> better and IMHO this is the case so I would prefer
>
> #define VIR_AUTOFREE(type) __attribute__((cleanup(virFree)))
>
> and
>
> VIR_AUTOFREE char *string = NULL;
I'm probably missing something, but couldn't you just have
#define VIR_AUTOFREE(type) __attribute__((cleanup(virFree))) type
which you would then use as
VIR_AUTOFREE(char *) string = NULL;
instead?
Yes you can have that as well, but it doesn't look ugly to you? :)
If majority will agree on that I don't care, just my opinion.
Pavel