Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/1] Fix issue found by coverity and cleanup

Coverity found an issue in lxc_driver and uml_driver that we don't check the return value of register functions. I've also updated all other places and unify the way we check the return value. Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina(a)redhat.com&gt; diff --git a/src/remote/remote_driver.c b/src/remote/remote_driver.c index 955465a..c9711bb 100644 --- a/src/remote/remote_driver.c +++ b/src/remote/remote_driver.c @@ -7825,15 +7825,23 @@ remoteRegister(void) { remoteDriver = &remote_driver; - if (virRegisterDriver(&remote_driver) == -1) return -1; - if (virRegisterNetworkDriver(&network_driver) == -1) return -1; - if (virRegisterInterfaceDriver(&interface_driver) == -1) return -1; - if (virRegisterStorageDriver(&storage_driver) == -1) return -1; - if (virRegisterNodeDeviceDriver(&node_device_driver) == -1) return -1; - if (virRegisterSecretDriver(&secret_driver) == -1) return -1; - if (virRegisterNWFilterDriver(&nwfilter_driver) == -1) return -1; + if (virRegisterDriver(&remote_driver) < 0) + return -1; + if (virRegisterNetworkDriver(&network_driver) < 0) + return -1; + if (virRegisterInterfaceDriver(&interface_driver) < 0) + return -1; + if (virRegisterStorageDriver(&storage_driver) < 0) + return -1; + if (virRegisterNodeDeviceDriver(&node_device_driver) < 0) + return -1; + if (virRegisterSecretDriver(&secret_driver) < 0) + return -1; + if (virRegisterNWFilterDriver(&nwfilter_driver) < 0) + return -1; #ifdef WITH_LIBVIRTD - if (virRegisterStateDriver(&state_driver) == -1) return -1; + if (virRegisterStateDriver(&state_driver) == -1) < 0) + return -1; #endif