13/08/13 16:15, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:52:33PM +0200, Fred A. Kemp wrote:
> From: "Fred A. Kemp" <anonym(a)riseup.net>
>
> Allow use of the usb-storage device only if the new capability flag
> QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_USB_STORAGE is set, which it is for qemu(-kvm)
> versions >= 0.12.1.2-rhel62-beta.
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 2 ++
> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 1 +
> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 6 +++---
> tests/qemuhelptest.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 3 ++-
> 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> index 47cc07a..5c566c1 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ VIR_ENUM_IMPL(virQEMUCaps, QEMU_CAPS_LAST,
> "vnc-share-policy", /* 150 */
> "device-del-event",
> "dmi-to-pci-bridge",
> + "usb-storage",
> );
>
> struct _virQEMUCaps {
> @@ -1383,6 +1384,7 @@ struct virQEMUCapsStringFlags virQEMUCapsObjectTypes[] = {
> { "vfio-pci", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VFIO_PCI },
> { "scsi-generic", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_SCSI_GENERIC },
> { "i82801b11-bridge", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_DMI_TO_PCI_BRIDGE },
> + { "usb-storage", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_USB_STORAGE },
> };
>
> static struct virQEMUCapsStringFlags virQEMUCapsObjectPropsVirtioBlk[] = {
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
> index 074e55d..4a8b14b 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
> @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ enum virQEMUCapsFlags {
> QEMU_CAPS_VNC_SHARE_POLICY = 150, /* set display sharing policy */
> QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_DEL_EVENT = 151, /* DEVICE_DELETED event */
> QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_DMI_TO_PCI_BRIDGE = 152, /* -device i82801b11-bridge */
> + QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_USB_STORAGE = 153, /* -device usb-storage */
>
> QEMU_CAPS_LAST, /* this must always be the last item */
> };
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> index b811e1d..03fb798 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> @@ -8044,10 +8044,10 @@ qemuBuildCommandLine(virConnectPtr conn,
> bool withDeviceArg = false;
> bool deviceFlagMasked = false;
>
> - /* Unless we have -device, then USB disks need special
> - handling */
> + /* Unless we have `-device usb-storage`, then USB disks
> + need special handling */
> if ((disk->bus == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_BUS_USB) &&
> - !virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE)) {
> + !virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_USB_STORAGE)) {
> if (disk->device == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_DEVICE_DISK) {
> virCommandAddArg(cmd, "-usbdevice");
> virCommandAddArgFormat(cmd, "disk:%s", disk->src);
Hmm, I'm not sure this logic change is right.
Previously if you have -device support, but 'usb-storage' was not
available, libvirt would try to start the guest with -device & then
QEMU would report an error.
With this change, if you have -device support, but 'usb-storage' was
not available, then libvirt is going to fallback to using the legacy
'-usbdevice' support. This is not good.
I fail to see why this is not good. I thought '-usbdevice' was the
correct way do handle USB disks if 'usb-storage' is missing. Whether we
have '-device' or seems beside the point; if we have 'usb-storage', then
it's implied we have '-device', and if we don't, '-device' is
worthless
and '-usbdevice' is the way to go. Letting QEMU fail and die when we
have '-device' but not 'usb-storage' seems worse than just falling back
to '-usbdevice'.
What am I missing?
Adding an explicit check for 'usb-storage' is a fine goal,
but we
should be doing that check in the branch of this if() that handles
'-device usb-storage', so we don't exercise the -usbdevice branch
This doesn't make sense to me either, but I guess it will after clearing
up my previous confusion.
Cheers!