Re: [Libvir] [RFC] Device attach/detach on virsh
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:21:00AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:50:40PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:50:53PM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
> To me this proposal is not okay as-is because it looks completely tied to
> Xen. But maybe I didn't understand, suppose I use KVM what would be the vbd
> or vif parameter looking like ? We need at least to change the terminology
> i.e. replace vif and vbd terms, but I'm afraid
Huh ? I didn't see anything in this proposal which was Xen-specific. The
Hum, sorry I misunderstood, I though it was using the vif and vbd internal
Xen numbers to adress the device. I was focusing on the delete operation,
and wondering what was the naming used.
disks where being identified based on their backend path (eg
/var/lib/xen/image/foo.img
or /dev/sda4), while network cards were being identified based on their
MAC address. Both of those are unique identifiers used by pretty much
any virt system.
yup objection removed,
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/