On 06/15/2017 04:53 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 06/14/2017 09:58 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 06/12/2017 11:57 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431112
>>
>> Imagine a FS mounted on /dev/blah/blah2. Our process of creating
>> suffix for temporary location where all the mounted filesystems
>> are moved is very simplistic. We want:
>>
>> /var/run/libvirt/qemu/$domName.$suffix\
>>
>> were $suffix is just the mount point path stripped of the "/dev/"
>> preffix. For instance:
>
> s/preffix/prefix
>
>>
>> /var/run/libvirt/qemu/fedora.mqueue for /dev/mqueue
>> /var/run/libvirt/qemu/fedora.pts for /dev/pts
>>
>> and so on. Now if we plug /dev/blah/blah2 into the example we see
>> some misbehaviour:
>>
>> /var/run/libvirt/qemu/fedora.blah/blah2
>>
>> Well, misbehaviour if /dev/blah/blah2 is a file, because in that
>> case we call virFileTouch() instead of virFileMakePath().
>>
>
> You didn't finish my bedtime story!
>
> Am I to assume that instead of :
>
> /var/run/libvirt/qemu/fedora.blah/blah2
>
> we would get
>
> /var/run/libvirt/qemu/fedora.blah.blah2
Yes.
>
> taking things one step further...
>
> would /dev/blah/blah2/blah3
>
> be
>
> /var/run/libvirt/qemu/fedora.blah.blah2.blah3
Yes.
>
> That's what I see coded at least... Or should the path be:
>
> /var/run/libvirt/qemu/fedora.blah/blah2.blah3
Nope. The former one.
>
>
> It would seem you'd want to get to the end, reverse search on '/' then
> if that spot is greater than @off, then convert it to a '.',
So basically, this is my approach just reversed. What'd be the benefits?
I find my algorithm small and easy to understand.
> but what do
> I know. I keep to the simple life and don't use namespaces.
Well, until a7cc039dc I didn't know that you can bind mount files. What
a strange thing to learn. What I want to say - you can learn some new
stuff when using namespaces ;-)
Michal
OK fair enough - be sure to finish the bed time story that this patch
converts @suffix directory 'layers' into the flat namespace using '.'
instead of '/'. The whole comment for 'mounts[i] is ...' could be
simplified to indicate that we're turning the complete @suffix from a
possible multi-directory level into a single flat file reference.
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
Just so you know IDC if you keep the for (...) in patch 2, I'm just not
a fan. You're the author, you got my OK for your method even though it's
not my personal preference.
John