On 02/24/2010 12:55 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
While this could lead people in the wrong direction, people most
commonly
hit this error when libvirtd isn't running, so let's mention a possible
fix.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson<crobinso(a)redhat.com>
---
src/remote/remote_driver.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/remote/remote_driver.c b/src/remote/remote_driver.c
index 8914c39..e10312c 100644
--- a/src/remote/remote_driver.c
+++ b/src/remote/remote_driver.c
@@ -723,8 +723,8 @@ doRemoteOpen (virConnectPtr conn,
}
}
virReportSystemError(errno,
- _("unable to connect to '%s'"),
- sockname);
+ _("unable to connect to '%s', libvirtd may need to be
started"),
+ sockname);
goto failed;
}
ACK. True, it could lead people in the wrong direction, but you've
phrased it nicely, and I think on the whole it's a good usability
enhancement.
Dave