On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:21:58AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 05/14/2018 09:18 AM, Maciej Wolny wrote:
> On 14/05/18 13:40, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 08:27:35AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/14/2018 07:24 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:09:20PM +0100, Maciej Wolny wrote:
>>>>> On 11/05/18 09:42, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:53:57AM +0100, Maciej Wolny wrote:
>>>>>>> Support OpenGL accelerated rendering when using SDL graphics
in the
>>>>>>> domain config. Add associated test and documentation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Maciej Wolny
<maciej.wolny(a)codethink.co.uk>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 6 +++
>>>>>>> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 8 ++++
>>>>>>> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 44
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>>> src/conf/domain_conf.h | 1 +
>>>>>>
>>>>>> docs, conf and schemas fit together nicely, they should be in
one
>>>>>> patch, but.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-sdl-gl.xml | 38
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> .../qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-sdl-gl.xml | 45
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 1 +
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this has nothing to do with qemu (yet), also see Subject (I
wouldn't say
>>>>>> 'qemu:' there, but rather something like 'docs, conf,
schema:')
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the XML tests above you can use genericxml2xmltest instead of
the
>>>>>> QEMU-specific one.
>>>>>
>>>>> The option only makes sense in QEMU afaik, hence the naming.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, for now. If someone who's building the code without QEMU
driver
>>>> changes
>>>> the behaviour, the tests will pass if you keep it in qemuxml2xml,
however
>>>> genericxml2xml will catch that. qemuxml2xml should be testing specifics
>>>> where
>>>> you behave based on some more information than just generic XML.
>>>>
>>>> I hope that's clear.
>>>>
>>>> Have a nice day.
>>>>
>>>
>>> However, until qemuxml2argvtest can also pull out of genericxml2xmldata,
>>> then you'd have separate xml input and output files - is that what's
>>> desired?
>>>
>>> Taking a quick look just now - see the graphics-vnc-socket - do we want
>>> to duplicate having two input/output XML files which invariably will
>>> diverge? Ironically the generic one has a domain type == qemu, an
>>> emulator using qemu, and the socket path using QEMU - so while it's
>>> generic in one sense, it's not in others. Even more ironic is the qemu
>>> specific file uses "<graphics type='vnc'
socket='/tmp/foo.socket'>".
>>>
>>> Could/should generification of the xml2xml tests be considered a "bite
>>> sized task"?
>>>
>>
>> Oh, definitely. It's only some time ago that the tests started to be usable
>> IIRC, so hopefully we'll migrate some XMLs here and there. But maybe others
>> could chime in as well so that I don't speak for others. I remember Pavel
>> having some ideas for cleaner separation of those.
>
> So, do you guys want to leave that for a separate patch set or do you want me to
> post a v3 with the changes Martin has requested?
>
My opinion is leave it as is - hard to require you to do something we're
not requiring other patches at this point. I'm not a fan of duplication
- that is the task would be to essentially copy everything into the
generic xml2xml test at this point.
Well, I got reminded several times about this, but it is poosible that that was
off-list (IRC or privately). I'm fine with leaving it as is. Mainly since
there are soo many of similar ones from the past. So sorry for blocking you
with this tiny, unimportant request.
John