On 08/09/2016 08:13 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 25.07.2016 22:48, Eric Farman wrote:
> In the case of other SCSI host devices, the device that is created
> within the guest will be within the usual SCSI namespace
> (e.g., host:bus:target:lun). But for vhost-scsi, the actual naming
> structure will come from the host configuration, and will be
> invisible to both QEMU and Libvirt. So specifying one with an
> <address type='drive' ...> tag (as is often done for virtio-scsi)
> doesn't make sense in this case, as it will be ignored.
>
> Nevertheless, we need something to identify our vhost-scsi device,
> so for that we'll drop back to the devno mapping that we use for
> other disks. (This option exists only for vhost-scsi-ccw, but not
> vhost-scsi-pci. Hrm...) This becomes <address type='ccw' ...> in
> the case of s390 systems, and puts the device number on the
> resulting QEMU command line. Thus, existing device number conflict
> detection can be used across other devices that may or may not be
> specified in the guest XML.
>
> If one is not specified, we need to be sure to allocate one so that
> we can avoid polluting the device numbers with silently-created
> entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 7 +++++++
> src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I don't feel confident enough to review this one. The code looks okay,
but from higher perspective I have no idea what it does. Sorry.
In testing my rework to Daniel Berrange's comment to patch 10
(
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-August/msg00464.html)
this patch ends up going away. So, no worries on the uncertainty here!
- Eric