On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:48:03PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:40:31PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:16:04PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > You need to read the instructions at the top, and download the
> > following appliance too:
> >
> >
http://libguestfs.org/download/binaries/appliance/appliance-1.18.9.tar.xz
> >
> > So far I've filed the following bugs:
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875741
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877110
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877312
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877429
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877430
>
> Thanks for the reproducer program, that should make life much easier.
>
> Just to confirm, you're seeing these problems on both 1.0.0 and
> current GIT master ?
Actually I'm testing libvirt-0.10.2.1-2.fc18.x86_64 & libvirt from
git, and seeing roughly the same set of problems with both. Didn't
try 1.0.0 at all.
To use libvirt from git, I'm doing:
killall libvirtd lt-libvirtd
~/d/libvirt/run ./test-parallel
Plus I should note a few things about my environment:
- Fedora 18
- 16 GB of RAM (if you don't have that, reduce NR_THREADS in the test)
- baremetal with KVM on a very fast Intel Sandybridge
(I doubt this is reproducible in a VM)
- I've configured core_pattern and ulimit to capture coredumps in /tmp
I've run the test on several machines, and finally found one which
would reproduce the "Operation is not valid" bug. I don't see any
of the other BZs you list above occurring.
At least i can now investigate what's gone wrong with 877430
Daniel
--
|: