On Tue, 2021-05-11 at 12:15 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 5/11/21 11:01 AM, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/conf/numa_conf.c | 42 ++++-----------------------------------
> ---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/numa_conf.c b/src/conf/numa_conf.c
> index 531bdc6eba..e631bfa341 100644
> --- a/src/conf/numa_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/numa_conf.c
> @@ -743,7 +743,6 @@
> virDomainNumaDefNodeDistanceParseXML(virDomainNuma *def,
> {
> int ret = -1;
> int sibling;
> - char *tmp = NULL;
> xmlNodePtr *nodes = NULL;
(Not about *this* patch, but rather the absence of a related patch)
The
other "Use virXMLProp*" patches have a companion patch that makes
"nodes" a g_autofree, but you haven't included that patch for this
function.
g-autofree-ing this function is not trivial (see label "cleanup"), like
it was with other function. The topic of this series-of-series is
replacing virXMLPropString + virStrTo* combos with
virXMLProp{enum,int,tristate,etc}, which is why at this time, this
function stays un-g-autofree-d. I will propably have a look at it at
some point in the future though.
Cheers,
Tim
> size_t i, ndistances = def->nmem_nodes;
>
> @@ -765,24 +764,9 @@
> virDomainNumaDefNodeDistanceParseXML(virDomainNuma *def,
> virDomainNumaDistance *rdist;
> unsigned int sibling_id, sibling_value;
>
> - /* siblings are in order of parsing or explicitly numbered
> */
> - if (!(tmp = virXMLPropString(nodes[i], "id"))) {
> - virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
> - _("Missing 'id' attribute in NUMA "
> - "distances under 'cell id %d'"),
> - cur_cell);
> - goto cleanup;
> - }
> -
> - /* The "id" needs to be applicable */
> - if (virStrToLong_uip(tmp, NULL, 10, &sibling_id) < 0) {
> - virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
> - _("Invalid 'id' attribute in NUMA "
> - "distances for sibling: '%s'"),
> - tmp);
> + if (virXMLPropUInt(nodes[i], "id", 10,
> VIR_XML_PROP_REQUIRED,
> + &sibling_id) < 0)
> goto cleanup;
> - }
> - VIR_FREE(tmp);
>
> /* The "id" needs to be within numa/cell range */
> if (sibling_id >= ndistances) {
> @@ -793,26 +777,9 @@
> virDomainNumaDefNodeDistanceParseXML(virDomainNuma *def,
> goto cleanup;
> }
>
> - /* We need a locality value. Check and correct
> - * distance to local and distance to remote node.
> - */
> - if (!(tmp = virXMLPropString(nodes[i], "value"))) {
> - virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
> - _("Missing 'value' attribute in NUMA
> distances "
> - "under 'cell id %d' for 'sibling id
> %d'"),
> - cur_cell, sibling_id);
> - goto cleanup;
> - }
> -
> - /* The "value" needs to be applicable */
> - if (virStrToLong_uip(tmp, NULL, 10, &sibling_value) < 0) {
> - virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
> - _("'value %s' is invalid for "
> - "'sibling id %d' under NUMA 'cell id
> %d'"),
> - tmp, sibling_id, cur_cell);
> + if (virXMLPropUInt(nodes[i], "value", 10,
> VIR_XML_PROP_REQUIRED,
> + &sibling_value) < 0)
> goto cleanup;
> - }
> - VIR_FREE(tmp);
>
> /* Assure LOCAL_DISTANCE <= "value" <= UNREACHABLE
> * and correct LOCAL_DISTANCE setting if such applies.
> @@ -867,7 +834,6 @@
> virDomainNumaDefNodeDistanceParseXML(virDomainNuma *def,
> def->mem_nodes[i].ndistances = 0;
> }
> VIR_FREE(nodes);
> - VIR_FREE(tmp);
>
> return ret;
> }
>