Hello,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:57:08AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
blk_throtl_work() calls generic_make_request() to dispatch some bios
and I
guess blk_throtl_work() has been put to sleep because threre are no request
descriptors available and CFQ is frozen so no requests descriptors get freed
hence blk_throtl_work() never finishes.
Following caught my eye.
ksoftirqd/0-3 [000] 1640.983585: 8,16 m N cfq4810 slice
expired t=0
ksoftirqd/0-3 [000] 1640.983588: 8,16 m N cfq4810
sl_used=2 disp=6 charge=2 iops=0 sect=2080
ksoftirqd/0-3 [000] 1640.983589: 8,16 m N cfq4810
del_from_rr
ksoftirqd/0-3 [000] 1640.983591: 8,16 m N cfq schedule
dispatch
sshd-3125 [004] 1640.983597: workqueue_queue_work: work
struct=ffff88102c3a3110 function=flush_to_ldisc workqueue=ffff88182c834a00
req_cpu=4 cpu=4
sshd-3125 [004] 1640.983598: workqueue_activate_work: work
struct ffff88102c3a3110
CFQ tries to schedule a work and but there is no associated
"workqueue_queue_work" trace. So it looks like that work never got queued.
CFQ calls following.
cfq_log(cfqd, "schedule dispatch");
kblockd_schedule_work(cfqd->queue, &cfqd->unplug_work);
We do see "schedule dispatch" message and kblockd_schedule_work() calls
queue_work(). So what happended here? This is strange. I will put one
more trace after kblockd_schedule_work() to trace that function returned.
It could be that the unplug work was already queued and in pending
state. The second queueing request will be ignored then. So, I think
the problem is that blk_throtl_work() occupies kblockd but requires
another work item (unplug_work) to make forward progress. In such
cases, forward progress cannot be guaranteed. Either
blk_throtl_work() or cfq unplug work should use a separate workqueue.
Thanks.
--
tejun