On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:05:49PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:26:39PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
>> This patch has the includes need to build on Solaris.
>> I've been using ifdef linux & ifndef linux to distinguish
>> between solaris and linux at this point.
>
>Looks ok aside from
>
>> +#ifndef __linux__
>> +#define NAME_MAX 14
>> +#endif
>
>The #ifndef should test against NAME_MAX itself, rather than __linux__
>
>Also, NAME_MAX is intended to be the maximum length of an unqualified
>filename, so 14 characters is rather too small. 255 is what Linux has
>it defined as, so I'd go for that unless Solaris has a different named
>constant for maximum filename length ? I know BSD uses MAXNAMLEN,
>but NAME_MAX is POSIX
Yep, I agree with both... Do yo want me to re-submit the patch
or do you want to make those changes?
No need - its quick enough to change this when its applied to CVS.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|