On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:47:13PM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
If CPU time is one of the major disincentives towards use of
compression
-- any reason lzop wasn't included?
Never heard of it before - if its useful to support it, then do send
patches...
$ time lzop <ramsave >ramsave.lzo
real 0m13.515s
user 0m7.500s
sys 0m1.340s
$ time gzip -c <ramsave >ramsave.gz
real 0m46.327s
user 0m37.690s
sys 0m1.360s
$ ls -lh ramsave ramsave.lzo ramsave.gz
-rw-rw---- 1 fvte fvte 707M Aug 26 22:26 ramsave
-rw-r--r-- 1 root fvte 282M Aug 27 17:48 ramsave.gz
-rw-rw---- 1 fvte fvte 330M Aug 27 17:47 ramsave.lzo
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|