On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 07:12:38AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
On 11/25/2016 08:12 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
> Enable libvirt users to modify daemon's logging output settings from outside.
> If either an empty string or NULL is passed, a default logging output will be
> used the same way as it would be in case writing an empty string to the
> libvirtd.conf
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> daemon/admin.c | 10 ++++++++++
> include/libvirt/libvirt-admin.h | 4 ++++
> src/admin/admin_protocol.x | 12 +++++++++++-
> src/admin_protocol-structs | 5 +++++
> src/libvirt-admin.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/libvirt_admin_private.syms | 1 +
> src/libvirt_admin_public.syms | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/src/libvirt_admin_public.syms b/src/libvirt_admin_public.syms
> index 234c50e..d4713da 100644
> --- a/src/libvirt_admin_public.syms
> +++ b/src/libvirt_admin_public.syms
> @@ -44,4 +44,5 @@ LIBVIRT_ADMIN_2.5.0 {
> global:
> virAdmConnectGetLoggingOutputs;
> virAdmConnectGetLoggingFilters;
> + virAdmConnectSetLoggingOutputs;
> } LIBVIRT_ADMIN_2.0.0;
>
s/2.5.0/3.0.0
Of course makes me think "eventually" would someone want or find it
useful to have "Add" or "Remove" options too rather than just
wholesale
replacement... Maybe it's just the fresh coffee talking.
I thought about this a while back and yes, I can imagine someone wanting that,
but at the same I think we should not push features that nobody has a usecase
for because you know, just in case...So, sure, we can add that easily, it just
isn't urgent IMHO.
Erik
ACK
John