On 03/19/2014 09:41 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071181
Commit 49b59a15 fixed one problem but masks another one related to pointer
freeing.
Avoid putting of the virNWFilterSnoopReq once the thread has been started.
It belongs to the thread and the thread will call virNWFilterSnoopReqPut() on it.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c b/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c
index d2a8062..6a2de98 100644
--- a/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c
+++ b/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c
@@ -1605,6 +1605,7 @@ virNWFilterDHCPSnoopReq(virNWFilterTechDriverPtr techdriver,
int tmp;
virThread thread;
virNWFilterVarValuePtr dhcpsrvrs;
+ bool threadPuts = false;
virNWFilterSnoopIFKeyFMT(ifkey, vmuuid, macaddr);
@@ -1690,6 +1691,8 @@ virNWFilterDHCPSnoopReq(virNWFilterTechDriverPtr techdriver,
/* prevent thread from holding req */
virNWFilterSnoopReqLock(req);
+ threadPuts = true;
+
So this has to be moved after the virThreadCreate()...
Stefan
if (virThreadCreate(&thread, false,
virNWFilterDHCPSnoopThread,
req) != 0) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
@@ -1737,7 +1740,8 @@ exit_rem_ifnametokey:
exit_snoopunlock:
virNWFilterSnoopUnlock();
exit_snoopreqput:
- virNWFilterSnoopReqPut(req);
+ if (!threadPuts)
+ virNWFilterSnoopReqPut(req);
return -1;
}