On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 07:41:12AM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 14:58:55 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> diff --git a/src/conf/storage_feature_conf.c b/src/conf/storage_feature_conf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..77e6406
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/conf/storage_feature_conf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +/*
> + * storage_feature_conf.c: config handling for storage file features
> + *
> + * Copyright: Red Hat, Inc
> + *
> + * LGLPv2.1+
> + */
I like this compact header, but I'm not sure if the rest of upstream has
the same opinion.
It was just a placeholder and I forgot to update it before sending the
series.
If we want to switch to a more compact header, I think it should be done
consistently all over the codebase.
I have squashed in a copy of the header from another conf file.
> + const char *xpath,
> + char **compat,
> + virBitmapPtr *features)
> +{
> + xmlNodePtr *nodes = NULL;
> + char *feat_xpath = NULL;
> + size_t i;
> + int n;
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + if (!virXPathNode(xpath, ctxt))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!*compat && VIR_STRDUP(*compat, "1.1") < 0)
> + return -1;
Is there a specific reason that you check whether the compat string is
not assigned previously?
Yes, the user might have specified a different compat level.
Jan