On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 07:38:27AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/01/2016 02:04 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
>
> There is a different regression that I also found which I've just
> posted patches for:
>
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-April/msg00067.html
>
> Because the fix involves adding in a new function that may or may not
> be compiled in depending on platform and options, I would appreciate
> if people on odd systems would try applying the patches and doing a
> build (since there won't be another release candidate). (of course it
> shouldn't be too bad, as it's only called from qemu, so it shouldn't
> cause headaches for bhve, for example, but I've been burned by this in
> the past so I'm extra cautious).
>
> I should be around as late as Monday AM (US EST) to push, but if it's
> not ACKed by then, I'll be on a plane for the rest of Monday - if that
> happens I would appreciate if the reviewer pushed it for me.
>
Michal ACKed this and I just pushed it. So this one isn't holding up
release any more.
My two fixes are in as well, so I guess from my POV we've got a "go" on
the release =)
Thanks Michal and Laine for helping take care of these issues and Daniel
for the patience!